> Il giorno 12 feb 2018, alle ore 17:31, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxx> ha scritto: > > On 02/11/18 23:35, Paolo Valente wrote: >> Also this smells a little bit like some spurious elevator call. >> Unfortunately I have no clue on the cause. To go on, I need at least >> to reproduce it. In this respect: Bart, could you please tell me how >> to setup the offending configuration, and to cause the failure? >> Possibly with just one, or at most two PCs. I don't have fancier hw >> at the moment. > > Hello Paolo, > > Although I expect that it is possible to reproduce this with an unmodified v4.16-rc1 kernel, this is how I ran into this issue: > * Clone the for-next branch of https://github.com/bvanassche/linux. > * Build and install that kernel in a virtual machine. > * Clone https://github.com/bvanassche/srp-test. > * Run the following command: > srp-test/run_tests -c -d -r 10 -t 02-mq -e bfq > Hi Bart, as a first attempt, I've followed your steps, but got: Error: could not find sg_reset expectedly because of dependencies that you are implying in your steps. So, I have followed the instructions in the srp-test README for the case "Running the Tests on an Ethernet Setup", directly on a 4.16-rc1. For ib_srp-backport, I get a lot of warnings like the following one, at "make install" (preceded by corresponding warnings at the end of the compilation): depmod: WARNING: /lib/modules/4.16.0-rc1+/extra/ib_srp.ko needs unknown symbol rdma_resolve_addr Unfortunately, it gets worse while executing "make scst srpt": CC [M] /home/paolo/scst/srpt/src/ib_srpt.o In file included from /home/paolo/scst/srpt/src/ib_srpt.c:62:0: /home/paolo/scst/srpt/src/ib_srpt.h:481:8: error: redefinition of ‘struct srp_login_req_rdma’ struct srp_login_req_rdma { ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from /home/paolo/scst/srpt/src/ib_srpt.h:44:0, from /home/paolo/scst/srpt/src/ib_srpt.c:62: /mnt/linux-dev/linux/include/scsi/srp.h:139:8: note: originally defined here struct srp_login_req_rdma { ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Could you please give me some help, so as to not get lost among these issues? Thanks, Paolo > Thanks, > > Bart.
