On 02/05/2018 04:20 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> This patch uses .force_blk_mq to drive HPSA via SCSI_MQ, meantime maps
> each reply queue to blk_mq's hw queue, then .queuecommand can always
> choose the hw queue as the reply queue. And if no any online CPU is
> mapped to one hw queue, request can't be submitted to this hw queue
> at all, finally the irq affinity issue is solved.
>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arun Easi <arun.easi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>,
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> Cc: James Bottomley <james.bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>,
> Cc: Don Brace <don.brace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Rivera <peter.rivera@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> index 443eabf63a9f..e517a4c74a28 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> #include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
> #include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/blk-mq-pci.h>
> #include <asm/unaligned.h>
> #include <asm/div64.h>
> #include "hpsa_cmd.h"
> @@ -956,6 +957,13 @@ static struct device_attribute *hpsa_shost_attrs[] = {
> #define HPSA_NRESERVED_CMDS (HPSA_CMDS_RESERVED_FOR_DRIVER +\
> HPSA_MAX_CONCURRENT_PASSTHRUS)
>
> +static int hpsa_map_queues(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> +{
> + struct ctlr_info *h = shost_to_hba(shost);
> +
> + return blk_mq_pci_map_queues(&shost->tag_set, h->pdev);
> +}
> +
> static struct scsi_host_template hpsa_driver_template = {
> .module = THIS_MODULE,
> .name = HPSA,
> @@ -974,10 +982,13 @@ static struct scsi_host_template hpsa_driver_template = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> .compat_ioctl = hpsa_compat_ioctl,
> #endif
> + .map_queues = hpsa_map_queues,
> .sdev_attrs = hpsa_sdev_attrs,
> .shost_attrs = hpsa_shost_attrs,
> .max_sectors = 1024,
> .no_write_same = 1,
> + .force_blk_mq = 1,
> + .host_tagset = 1,
> };
>
> static inline u32 next_command(struct ctlr_info *h, u8 q)
> @@ -1045,11 +1056,7 @@ static void set_performant_mode(struct ctlr_info *h, struct CommandList *c,
> c->busaddr |= 1 | (h->blockFetchTable[c->Header.SGList] << 1);
> if (unlikely(!h->msix_vectors))
> return;
> - if (likely(reply_queue == DEFAULT_REPLY_QUEUE))
> - c->Header.ReplyQueue =
> - raw_smp_processor_id() % h->nreply_queues;
> - else
> - c->Header.ReplyQueue = reply_queue % h->nreply_queues;
> + c->Header.ReplyQueue = reply_queue;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1063,10 +1070,7 @@ static void set_ioaccel1_performant_mode(struct ctlr_info *h,
> * Tell the controller to post the reply to the queue for this
> * processor. This seems to give the best I/O throughput.
> */
> - if (likely(reply_queue == DEFAULT_REPLY_QUEUE))
> - cp->ReplyQueue = smp_processor_id() % h->nreply_queues;
> - else
> - cp->ReplyQueue = reply_queue % h->nreply_queues;
> + cp->ReplyQueue = reply_queue;
> /*
> * Set the bits in the address sent down to include:
> * - performant mode bit (bit 0)
> @@ -1087,10 +1091,7 @@ static void set_ioaccel2_tmf_performant_mode(struct ctlr_info *h,
> /* Tell the controller to post the reply to the queue for this
> * processor. This seems to give the best I/O throughput.
> */
> - if (likely(reply_queue == DEFAULT_REPLY_QUEUE))
> - cp->reply_queue = smp_processor_id() % h->nreply_queues;
> - else
> - cp->reply_queue = reply_queue % h->nreply_queues;
> + cp->reply_queue = reply_queue;
> /* Set the bits in the address sent down to include:
> * - performant mode bit not used in ioaccel mode 2
> * - pull count (bits 0-3)
> @@ -1109,10 +1110,7 @@ static void set_ioaccel2_performant_mode(struct ctlr_info *h,
> * Tell the controller to post the reply to the queue for this
> * processor. This seems to give the best I/O throughput.
> */
> - if (likely(reply_queue == DEFAULT_REPLY_QUEUE))
> - cp->reply_queue = smp_processor_id() % h->nreply_queues;
> - else
> - cp->reply_queue = reply_queue % h->nreply_queues;
> + cp->reply_queue = reply_queue;
> /*
> * Set the bits in the address sent down to include:
> * - performant mode bit not used in ioaccel mode 2
> @@ -1152,11 +1150,27 @@ static void dial_up_lockup_detection_on_fw_flash_complete(struct ctlr_info *h,
> h->heartbeat_sample_interval = HEARTBEAT_SAMPLE_INTERVAL;
> }
>
> +static unsigned get_reply_queue(struct ctlr_info *h, struct CommandList *c)
> +{
> + struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = c->scsi_cmd;
> + int *map;
> +
> + if (cmd && cmd->request) {
> + u32 tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(cmd->request);
> + return blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(tag);
> + }
> +
> + map = h->scsi_host->tag_set.mq_map;
> + return map[raw_smp_processor_id()];
> +}
> +
> static void __enqueue_cmd_and_start_io(struct ctlr_info *h,
> struct CommandList *c, int reply_queue)
> {
> dial_down_lockup_detection_during_fw_flash(h, c);
> atomic_inc(&h->commands_outstanding);
> +
> + reply_queue = get_reply_queue(h, c);
> switch (c->cmd_type) {
> case CMD_IOACCEL1:
> set_ioaccel1_performant_mode(h, c, reply_queue);
> @@ -5781,6 +5795,9 @@ static int hpsa_scsi_add_host(struct ctlr_info *h)
> {
> int rv;
>
> + /* map reply queue to blk_mq hw queue */
> + h->scsi_host->nr_hw_queues = h->msix_vectors;
> +
> rv = scsi_add_host(h->scsi_host, &h->pdev->dev);
> if (rv) {
> dev_err(&h->pdev->dev, "scsi_add_host failed\n");
>
I really wonder why we need to call 'raw_smp_processor' here; typically
the queue should be encoded in the tag, so it would be better to call
blk_mq_unique_tag()/blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq() here to get the hardware
queue.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
