Re: [PATCH] block: blk-mq-sched: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2018/1/25 10:58, Al Viro wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:46:26AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
The function ioc_create_icq here is not called in atomic context.
Thus GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, and it can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL.

This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
Umm...  Some human-readable analysis would be welcome.  FWIW, I've tried to
put a proof together, but...
	struct blk_mq_ops->timeout = nvme_timeout
	nvme_timeout()
		nvme_alloc_request()
			blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx()
				blk_mq_get_request()
					blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc()
... and while I have not traced the call chain further, the look of that
function (nvme_timeout()) strongly suggests that it *is* meant to be
called from bloody atomic context.

"My tool has found that place/put together a proof" is nice, but it
doesn't replace the proof itself...

Thanks for reply :)

I have checked the given call chain, and find that nvme_dev_disable in nvme_timeout calls mutex_lock that can sleep.
Thus, I suppose this call chain is not in atomic context.

Besides, how do you find that "function (nvme_timeout()) strongly suggests that it *is* meant to be called from bloody atomic context"?
I check the comments in nvme_timeout, and do not find related description...

By the way, do you mean that I should add "My tool has proved that this function is never called in atomic context" in the description?


Thanks,
Jia-Ju Bai



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux