Re: [PATCH] bcache: closures: move control bits one bit right

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/9/18 12:13 PM, Michael Lyle wrote:
> Otherwise, architectures that do negated adds of atomics (e.g. s390)
> to do atomic_sub fail in closure_set_stopped.

Applied, thanks for fixing that up.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux