> Il giorno 21 dic 2017, alle ore 10:14, Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>
>
>
> On 12/21/2017 03:53 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>
>>> Il giorno 21 dic 2017, alle ore 08:08, Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/08/2017 08:34 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>>> So plugging in a device on USB with BFQ as scheduler now works without
>>>> hiccup (probably thanks to Ming Lei's last patch), but of course I found
>>>> another problem. Unmounting the device after use, changing the scheduler
>>>> back to deadline or kyber and rmmod'ing the BFQ module reproducibly gives me:
>>>>
>>>> kernel: =============================================================================
>>>> kernel: BUG bfq_queue (Tainted: G B ): Objects remaining in bfq_queue on __kmem_cache_shutdown()
>>>> kernel: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> kernel:
>>>> kernel: INFO: Slab 0xffffea001601fc00 objects=37 used=3 fp=0xffff8805807f0360 flags=0x8000000000008100
>>>> kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 9967 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G B 4.14.5 #1
>>>> kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. P67-DS3-B3/P67-DS3-B3, BIOS F1 05/06/2011
>>>> kernel: Call Trace:
>>>> kernel: dump_stack+0x46/0x5e
>>>> kernel: slab_err+0x9e/0xb0
>>>> kernel: ? on_each_cpu_mask+0x35/0x40
>>>> kernel: ? ksm_migrate_page+0x60/0x60
>>>> kernel: ? __kmalloc+0x1c9/0x1d0
>>>> kernel: __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x177/0x350
>>>> kernel: shutdown_cache+0xf/0x130
>>>> kernel: kmem_cache_destroy+0x19e/0x1b0
>>>> kernel: SyS_delete_module+0x168/0x230
>>>> kernel: ? exit_to_usermode_loop+0x39/0x80
>>>> kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x94
>>>> kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f53e4136b97
>>>> kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffd660061d8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
>>>> kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f53e4136b97
>>>> kernel: RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00000000006247f8
>>>> kernel: RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffd66005171 R09: 0000000000000000
>>>> kernel: R10: 00007f53e41acbc0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000624790
>>>> kernel: R13: 00007ffd660051d0 R14: 0000000000624790 R15: 0000000000623260
>>>> kernel: INFO: Object 0xffff8805807f0000 @offset=0
>>>> kernel: INFO: Object 0xffff8805807f01b0 @offset=432
>>>> kernel: INFO: Object 0xffff8805807f3cc0 @offset=15552
>>>> kernel: kmem_cache_destroy bfq_queue: Slab cache still has objects
>>>> kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 9967 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G B 4.14.5 #1
>>>> kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. P67-DS3-B3/P67-DS3-B3, BIOS F1 05/06/2011
>>>> kernel: Call Trace:
>>>> kernel: dump_stack+0x46/0x5e
>>>> kernel: kmem_cache_destroy+0x191/0x1b0
>>>> kernel: SyS_delete_module+0x168/0x230
>>>> kernel: ? exit_to_usermode_loop+0x39/0x80
>>>> kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x94
>>>> kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f53e4136b97
>>>> kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffd660061d8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
>>>> kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f53e4136b97
>>>> kernel: RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00000000006247f8
>>>> kernel: RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffd66005171 R09: 0000000000000000
>>>> kernel: R10: 00007f53e41acbc0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000624790
>>>> kernel: R13: 00007ffd660051d0 R14: 0000000000624790 R15: 0000000000623260
>>>>
>>> I also encountered the similar bug, seems there are some async objects which are not freed with
>>> BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED build as "Y".
>>>
>>> If revert part of commit e21b7a0b988772e82e7147e1c659a5afe2ae003c ("block, bfq: add full hierarchical
>>> scheduling and cgroups support")like below, then I can't see the bug again with simple test.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
>>> index 889a8549d97f..c640e64e042f 100644
>>> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
>>> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
>>> @@ -4710,6 +4710,7 @@ static void bfq_exit_queue(struct elevator_queue *e)
>>> spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(bfqq, n, &bfqd->idle_list, bfqq_list)
>>> bfq_deactivate_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, false, false);
>>> + bfq_put_async_queues(bfqd, bfqd->root_group);
>>> spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
>>>
>>> hrtimer_cancel(&bfqd->idle_slice_timer);
>>> @@ -4718,7 +4719,6 @@ static void bfq_exit_queue(struct elevator_queue *e)
>>> blkcg_deactivate_policy(bfqd->queue, &blkcg_policy_bfq);
>>> #else
>>> spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
>>> - bfq_put_async_queues(bfqd, bfqd->root_group);
>>> kfree(bfqd->root_group);
>>> spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
>>>
>>> But perhaps we should do it inside blkcg_deactivate_policy, right?
>>>
>> Thank you very much for investigating this. And yes, I removed that bfq_put_async_queues invocation a long ago, because it had to be done in blkcg_deactivate_policy; and actually it was invoked as expected. We are trying to understand what is going wrong now.
>
> Thanks for the in formations. I find another way, does it make sense?
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> index da1525ec4c87..0a070daf96c7 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> @@ -474,7 +474,10 @@ static void bfq_pd_init(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
> static void bfq_pd_free(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
> {
> struct bfq_group *bfqg = pd_to_bfqg(pd);
> + struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;
>
> + if (bfqd)
> + bfq_put_async_queues(bfqd, bfqg);
> bfqg_stats_exit(&bfqg->stats);
> bfqg_put(bfqg);
> }
>
Yes, thanks. Actually, the mistake was a little bit more articulate. I have just
submitted a hopefully clean fix:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2692962.html
Any feedback is more than welcome.
Thanks again,
Paolo
> Regards,
> Guoqing
