On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 10:29:33AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > No argument needed. Definitely needs fixing. Too many upper layers > consider BLK_STS_NOSPC retryable (XFS, ext4, dm-thinp, etc). Which > NVME_SC_LBA_RANGE absolutely isn't. > > When I backfilled NVME_SC_LBA_RANGE handling I categorized it as > BLK_STS_TARGET. Do you have a better suggestion for how > NVME_SC_LBA_RANGE should be categorized? It's basically a kernel bug as it tries to access lbas that do not exist. BLK_STS_TARGET should be fine.
