On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 12:12:52PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >>> But that does bring up the fact if we should always be doing the >>> nvme_process_cq(nvmeq) after IO submission. For direct/hipri IO, >>> maybe it's better to make the submission path faster and skip it? >> >> Yes, I am okay to remove the opprotunistic nvme_process_cq in the >> submission path. Even under deeply queued IO, I've not seen this provide >> any measurable benefit. > > +100 for removing it. Never really understood why it gets us anything... Yes, we should get rid of it.
