On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:41:02PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 11:01 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Currently, blk-mq timeout path synchronizes against the usual > > issue/completion path using a complex scheme involving atomic > > bitflags, REQ_ATOM_*, memory barriers and subtle memory coherence > > rules. Unfortunatley, it contains quite a few holes. > > Hello Tejun, > > An attempt to run SCSI I/O with this patch series applied resulted in > the following: Can you please try the v3? There were a couple bugs that I missed while testing earlier versions. http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171216120726.517153-1-tj@xxxxxxxxxx Thanks. -- tejun