Re: [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme
From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:13:52 -0800
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, oleg@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxx, osandov@xxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx
In-reply-to: <83fa38dc-ce9c-054a-43e9-38b339e5fb27@oracle.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Hi, Jianchao.

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:07:30PM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
> Test ok with NVMe

Awesome, thanks for testing!

-- 
tejun

References:
- [PATCHSET v2] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling
  - From: Tejun Heo
- [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme
  - From: Tejun Heo
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme
  - From: jianchao.wang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/6] blk-mq: protect completion path with RCU
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/10] block: cleanup on direct access to bvec table(prepare for multipage bvec)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux