On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:29:59AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 08:20 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > Also it is a bit odd to see request in hctx->dispatch now, and it can only > > happen now when scsi_target_queue_ready() returns false, so I guess you apply > > some change on target->can_queue(such as setting it as 1 in srp/ib code > > manually)? > > Yes, but that had already been mentioned. From the e-mail at the start of > this e-mail thread: "Change the SRP initiator such that SCSI target queue > depth is limited to 1." The changes I made in the SRP initiator are the same > as those described in the following message from about one month ago: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg114720.html. OK, got it. Then no reason to revert commit(0df21c86bdbf scsi: implement .get_budget an .put_budget for blk-mq) for one issue which may never happen in reality since this reproducer need out-of-tree patch. I don't mean it isn't a issue, but I don't think it has top priority for reverting commit 0df21c86bdbf. Especially there isn't proof shown that 0df21c86bdbf causes this issue since this commit won't change run queue for requests in hctx->dispatch_list. I's like to take a look if someone'd like to cooperate, such as providing kernel log, test debug patch, and kind of things. Or when I get this hardware to reproduce. -- Ming
