Re: [GIT PULL] nvme fixes for Linux 4.15

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/23/2017 09:54 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/23/2017 07:44 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Sagi Grimberg (3):
>>       nvme-fc: check if queue is ready in queue_rq
>>       nvme-loop: check if queue is ready in queue_rq
> 
> The nvme-loop part looks fine, but why is the nvme-fc part using:
> 
> enum nvme_fc_queue_flags {                                                     
>         NVME_FC_Q_CONNECTED = (1 << 0),                                         
> +       NVME_FC_Q_LIVE = (1 << 1),                                              
> }; 
> 
> for flags that are used with set_bit() and friends? That's just
> misleading, should be 0, 1, etc, not a shift.
> 
> The rest looks pretty straight forward, but the above is an eye sore.

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
index e0577bf33f45..0a8af4daef89 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
@@ -31,8 +31,8 @@
 
 
 enum nvme_fc_queue_flags {
-	NVME_FC_Q_CONNECTED = (1 << 0),
-	NVME_FC_Q_LIVE = (1 << 1),
+	NVME_FC_Q_CONNECTED = 0,
+	NVME_FC_Q_LIVE,
 };
 
 #define NVMEFC_QUEUE_DELAY	3		/* ms units */

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux