Re: [PATCH] bio: ensure __bio_clone_fast copies bi_partno

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 23:47 -0800, Michael Lyle wrote:
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 101c2a9b5481..33fa6b4af312 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -597,6 +597,7 @@ void __bio_clone_fast(struct bio *bio, struct bio *bio_src)
>  	 * so we don't set nor calculate new physical/hw segment counts here
>  	 */
>  	bio->bi_disk = bio_src->bi_disk;
> +	bio->bi_partno = bio_src->bi_partno;
>  	bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_CLONED);
>  	bio->bi_opf = bio_src->bi_opf;
>  	bio->bi_write_hint = bio_src->bi_write_hint;

Have you considered to use bio_copy_dev() instead of open-coding it?

Additionally, there is more code that copies these fields, e.g. the code in
bio_clone_bioset(). Shouldn't that code be modified such that it also copies
bi_partno?

How about the following class of assignments in drivers/md/raid1.c:

		mbio->bi_disk = (void *)conf->mirrors[i].rdev;

Should these assignments perhaps be followed by a mbio->bi_partno assignment?

How about the following class of assignments in the NVMe code:

               bio->bi_disk = disk;

Should these assignments perhaps be followed by a bio->bi_partno assignment?

Thanks,

Bart.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux