On 3 November 2017 at 14:20, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> card_busy_detect() doesn't set a correct timeout, and it doesn't take care
> of error status bits. Stop using it for blk-mq.
I think this changelog isn't very descriptive. Could you please work
on that for the next version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> index 0c29b1d8d545..5c5ff3c34313 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> @@ -1426,15 +1426,18 @@ static inline void mmc_apply_rel_rw(struct mmc_blk_request *brq,
> }
> }
>
> -#define CMD_ERRORS \
> - (R1_OUT_OF_RANGE | /* Command argument out of range */ \
> - R1_ADDRESS_ERROR | /* Misaligned address */ \
> +#define CMD_ERRORS_EXCL_OOR \
> + (R1_ADDRESS_ERROR | /* Misaligned address */ \
> R1_BLOCK_LEN_ERROR | /* Transferred block length incorrect */\
> R1_WP_VIOLATION | /* Tried to write to protected block */ \
> R1_CARD_ECC_FAILED | /* Card ECC failed */ \
> R1_CC_ERROR | /* Card controller error */ \
> R1_ERROR) /* General/unknown error */
>
> +#define CMD_ERRORS \
> + (CMD_ERRORS_EXCL_OOR | \
> + R1_OUT_OF_RANGE) /* Command argument out of range */ \
> +
> static void mmc_blk_eval_resp_error(struct mmc_blk_request *brq)
> {
> u32 val;
> @@ -1951,6 +1954,95 @@ static void mmc_blk_ss_read(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
> mqrq->retries = MMC_NO_RETRIES;
> }
>
> +static inline bool mmc_blk_oor_valid(struct mmc_blk_request *brq)
> +{
> + return !!brq->mrq.sbc;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 mmc_blk_stop_err_bits(struct mmc_blk_request *brq)
> +{
> + return mmc_blk_oor_valid(brq) ? CMD_ERRORS : CMD_ERRORS_EXCL_OOR;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool mmc_blk_in_tran_state(u32 status)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Some cards mishandle the status bits, so make sure to check both the
> + * busy indication and the card state.
> + */
> + return status & R1_READY_FOR_DATA &&
> + (R1_CURRENT_STATE(status) == R1_STATE_TRAN);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int mmc_blk_clock_khz(struct mmc_host *host)
> +{
> + if (host->actual_clock)
> + return host->actual_clock / 1000;
> +
> + /* Clock may be subject to a divisor, fudge it by a factor of 2. */
> + if (host->ios.clock)
> + return host->ios.clock / 2000;
> +
> + /* How can there be no clock */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + return 100; /* 100 kHz is minimum possible value */
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long mmc_blk_data_timeout_jiffies(struct mmc_host *host,
> + struct mmc_data *data)
> +{
> + unsigned int ms = DIV_ROUND_UP(data->timeout_ns, 1000000);
> + unsigned int khz;
> +
> + if (data->timeout_clks) {
> + khz = mmc_blk_clock_khz(host);
> + ms += DIV_ROUND_UP(data->timeout_clks, khz);
> + }
> +
> + return msecs_to_jiffies(ms);
> +}
> +
> +static int mmc_blk_card_stuck(struct mmc_card *card, struct request *req,
> + u32 *resp_errs)
> +{
> + struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq = req_to_mmc_queue_req(req);
> + struct mmc_data *data = &mqrq->brq.data;
> + unsigned long timeout;
> + u32 status;
> + int err;
> +
> + timeout = jiffies + mmc_blk_data_timeout_jiffies(card->host, data);
> +
> + while (1) {
> + bool done = time_after(jiffies, timeout);
> +
> + err = __mmc_send_status(card, &status, 5);
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("%s: error %d requesting status\n",
> + req->rq_disk->disk_name, err);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* Accumulate any response error bits seen */
> + if (resp_errs)
> + *resp_errs |= status;
> +
> + if (mmc_blk_in_tran_state(status))
> + break;
> +
> + /* Timeout if the device never becomes ready */
> + if (done) {
> + pr_err("%s: Card stuck in wrong state! %s %s\n",
> + mmc_hostname(card->host),
> + req->rq_disk->disk_name, __func__);
> + err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
The new function here, mmc_blk_card_stuck() looks very similar to
card_busy_detect().
Why can't you instead fixup card_busy_detect() so it behaves like the
new mmc_blk_card_stuck(), rather than re-implementing most of it?
> +
> static void mmc_blk_rw_recovery(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
> {
> int type = rq_data_dir(req) == READ ? MMC_BLK_READ : MMC_BLK_WRITE;
> @@ -2097,17 +2189,26 @@ static inline bool mmc_blk_rq_error(struct mmc_blk_request *brq)
> static int mmc_blk_card_busy(struct mmc_card *card, struct request *req)
> {
> struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq = req_to_mmc_queue_req(req);
> - bool gen_err = false;
> + u32 status = 0;
> int err;
>
> if (mmc_host_is_spi(card->host) || rq_data_dir(req) == READ)
> return 0;
>
> - err = card_busy_detect(card, MMC_BLK_TIMEOUT_MS, false, req, &gen_err);
> + err = mmc_blk_card_stuck(card, req, &status);
> +
> + /*
> + * Do not assume data transferred correctly if there are any error bits
> + * set.
> + */
> + if (!err && status & mmc_blk_stop_err_bits(&mqrq->brq)) {
> + mqrq->brq.data.bytes_xfered = 0;
> + err = -EIO;
> + }
>
> - /* Copy the general error bit so it will be seen later on */
> - if (gen_err)
> - mqrq->brq.stop.resp[0] |= R1_ERROR;
> + /* Copy the exception bit so it will be seen later on */
> + if (mmc_card_mmc(card) && status & R1_EXCEPTION_EVENT)
> + mqrq->brq.cmd.resp[0] |= R1_EXCEPTION_EVENT;
>
> return err;
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Kind regards
Uffe
