Re: [PATCH] SCSI: don't get target/host busy_count in scsi_mq_get_budget()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/08/2017 09:41 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 20:06 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> At this point, I have no idea what Bart's setup looks like. Bart, it
>> would be REALLY helpful if you could tell us how you are reproducing
>> your hang. I don't know why this has to be dragged out.
> 
> Hello Jens,
> 
> It is a disappointment to me that you have allowed Ming to evaluate other
> approaches than reverting "blk-mq: don't handle TAG_SHARED in restart". That
> patch namely replaces an algorithm that is trusted by the community with an
> algorithm of which even Ming acknowledged that it is racy. A quote from [1]:
> "IO hang may be caused if all requests are completed just before the current
> SCSI device is added to shost->starved_list". I don't know of any way to fix
> that race other than serializing request submission and completion by adding
> locking around these actions, which is something we don't want. Hence my
> request to revert that patch.

I was reluctant to revert it, in case we could work out a better way of
doing it. As I mentioned in the other replies, it's not exactly the
prettiest or most efficient. However, since we currently don't have
a good solution for the issue, I'm fine with reverting that patch.

> Regarding the test I run, here is a summary of what I mentioned in previous
> e-mails:
> * I modified the SRP initiator such that the SCSI target queue depth is
>   reduced to one by setting starget->can_queue to 1 from inside
>   scsi_host_template.target_alloc.
> * With that modified SRP initiator I run the srp-test software as follows
>   until something breaks:
>   while ./run_tests -f xfs -d -e deadline -r 60; do :; done

What kernel options are needed? Where do I download everything I need?

In other words, would it be possible to do a fuller guide for getting
this setup and running?

I'll run my simple test case as well, since it's currently breaking
basically everywhere.

> Today a system with at least one InfiniBand HCA is required to run that test.
> When I have the time I will post the SRP initiator and target patches on the
> linux-rdma mailing list that make it possible to run that test against the
> SoftRoCE driver (drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe). The only hardware required to
> use that driver is an Ethernet adapter.

OK, I guess I can't run it then... I'll have to rely on your testing.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux