Tang-- On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:15 PM, <tang.junhui@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I read the the code again, and found that find_next_bit() would return 7 in this > scenario, but the bucket number begin with 0, so the 7th bucket's number is 6, > so it will take the last bucket as the first bucket to read journal, > so the 7the bucket would not be lost. I will change this patch to a annotation patch, > other readers would be easy to understand these codes. Thank you. It is way too complicated/tricky :) Mike
