Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] block: remove unnecessary RESTART

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ming,

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Bart,
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 04:53:18AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-10-27 at 12:43 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> > The 1st patch removes the RESTART for TAG-SHARED because SCSI handles it
>> > by itself, and not necessary to waste CPU to do the expensive RESTART.
>> > And Roman Pen reported that this RESTART cuts half of IOPS in his case.
>> >
>> > The 2nd patch removes the RESTART when .get_budget returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE,
>> > and this RESTART is handled by SCSI's RESTART(scsi_end_request()) too.
>>
>> Hello Ming,
>>
>> There are more block drivers than the SCSI core that share tags. If the
>
> Could you share us what the other in-tree driver which share tags is?
>
> If there are really more, and when all can share similar RESTART mechanism, I
> think that is the time for considering the common RESTART.
>
>> restart mechanism is removed from the blk-mq core, does that mean that all
>> block drivers that share tags will have to follow the example of the SCSI
>> core and implement a restart mechanism themselves? As far as I know there
>
> If there are such drivers, there should have been their own restart mechanism
> which works for long time before blk-mq comes, and more importantly each driver
> has much more knowledge than generic block layer to handle the restart,
> such as SCSI's restart, that means driver's implementation may be more efficient.

Personally I would be happier if block layer would do restarts for me.  My eyes
are bleeding when I see chunks of my own code which do this juggling with hctx,
enqueuing or dequeuing from a percpu lists, etc inside IBNBD driver.

> Also the RESTART for TAG-SHARED may never function as expected wrt. SCSI.

E.g. new BLK_MQ_F_NO_RESTARTS flag can help to disable restarts when they
are not needed.

> And more importantly the block's RESTART for TAG-SHARED has caused big performance
> issue for people.

That's just a bug in code, not a in issue with restarts, which can be fixed
if we put hctx which are needed to be restarted in percpu lists and avoid
long loops and contentions.

--
Roman



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux