On 10/17/2017 10:09 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 10/16/2017 06:03 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 10/05/2017 05:13 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to >>>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() >>>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. >>> >>> Applied to for-4.15/timer >> >> Hi, >> >> I just wanted to check what your timer plans were for merging this >> into -next (I'm doing rebasing to find out which maintainers I need to >> resend patches to, and I noticed block hasn't appeared in -next, but I >> know you've pulled patches...) > > It should be in for-next, since I wrote that email. It's in my > for-4.15/timer branch, which is also merged into my for-next branch > (which is the one that Stephen pulls). Just pulled in for-next, and it seems to contain what it should. If you see missing block related timer patches in for-next, then they haven't been applied to my tree yet. axboe@dell:[.]home/axboe/git/linux-next $ git log drivers/block/aoe/ commit a79c192c7cdb639ad1b059cedbf3dfa68427a170 Author: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Oct 5 16:13:54 2017 -0700 block/aoe: Convert timers to use timer_setup() [...] -- Jens Axboe