On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 08:21 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 10/17/2017 12:49 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Anil Ravindranath <anil_ravindranath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h b/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h
> > index 8bfac72a242b..44da91712115 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h
> > @@ -542,7 +542,6 @@ struct pmcraid_sglist {
> > u32 order;
> > u32 num_sg;
> > u32 num_dma_sg;
> > - u32 buffer_len;
> > struct scatterlist scatterlist[1];
> > };
> >
> >
>
> This actually is the same story that we've had with ipr (and, looking at
> the code, those two drivers look awfully similar ...).
> pmcraid_sglist looks as if it's a hardware-dependent structure, so just
> removing one entry from the middle of a structure might not be a good idea.
> But this is something for the pmcraid folks to clarify.
Hello Hannes,
Sorry but I don't see how a structure that contains a struct scatterlist
could be hardware-dependent?
Thanks,
Bart.
