Jens--
Thanks for your patience.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 11:34 AM, Michael Lyle wrote:
>> Sorry this got through to linux-block, was detected by the kbuilds test
>> robot. NSEC_PER_SEC is a long constant; 2.5 * 10^9 doesn't fit in a
>> signed long constant.
>
> Applied, but you should remember to add Fixes lines when a patch
> explicitly fixes a problem introduced by a previous patch. Ala:
>
> Fixes: e41166c5c44e ("bcache: writeback rate shouldn't artifically clamp")
>
> so that backports have an easier time finding dependent fixes.
Sorry about that too. I considered the Fixes: tag but didn't know if
the hashes would "hold true" into mainline. Now I see Linus merges
your tree so the hash should be durable.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
Mike
