Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Move tagset reinit to its only current consumer, nvme-core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Move tagset reinit to its only current consumer, nvme-core
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 05:48:17 -0700
Cc: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1507715588-1041-1-git-send-email-sagi@grimberg.me>
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

Jens, are you fine with picking this up throught the nvme tree?
I think Sagi's later changes rely on it, so that would make life
a littler easier.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Move tagset reinit to its only current consumer, nvme-core
  - From: Jens Axboe

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/3] Move tagset reinit to its only current consumer, nvme-core
  - From: Sagi Grimberg

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] block: cope with WRITE ZEROES failing in blkdev_issue_zeroout()
Next by Date: [PATCH v3 0/2] block: cope with WRITE ZEROES failing in blkdev_issue_zeroout()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] block: introduce blk_mq_tagset_iter
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Move tagset reinit to its only current consumer, nvme-core
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux