Re: [PATCH 01/10] Initial multipath implementation.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:48:22PM -0700, Anish Jhaveri wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:00:44PM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
> > 
> > I find this patch series confusing to review. You declare these failover
> > functions in patch 1, use them in patch 2, but they're not defined until
> > patch 7.
> Sorry for late reply. 
> 
> Idea was to keep header file changes as separate patch. 
> I will move the function declaration to patch 7 and 
> rearrange the patch series. If you or anyone else finds 
> something which could help in browsing the changes, I
> will try to incorporate next patchset.

At the very least, you don't want any patch in the series to depend
on a future patch just to compile. There are multiple breakages like
that in your series. For example, patch 5 starts a kthread at function
nvme_mpath_kthread, but that function doesn't exist until patch 8.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux