Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] block/loop: suppress discard IO error message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>
>
> We don't know if fallocate really supports FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE till
> fallocate is called. If it doesn't support, loop will return -EOPNOTSUPP
> and we see a lot of error message printed by blk_update_request. Failure
> for discard IO isn't a big problem, so we just return 0 in loop which
> will suppress the IO error message.

Setting RQF_QUIET for discard IO should be more clean for suppressing error,
and upper layer can get the failure notification too.

-- 
Ming Lei



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux