On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:51:21AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:13:39AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:56:05PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:24:53PM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote: > > > > From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Currently loop disables merge. While it makes sense for buffer IO mode, > > > > directio mode can benefit from request merge. Without merge, loop could > > > > send small size IO to underlayer disk and harm performance. > > > > > > Hi Shaohua, > > > > > > IMO no matter if merge is used, loop always sends page by page > > > to VFS in both dio or buffer I/O. > > > > Why do you think so? > > do_blockdev_direct_IO() still handles page by page from iov_iter, and > with bigger request, I guess it might be the plug merge working. This is not true. directio sends big size bio directly, not because of plug merge. Please at least check the code before you complain. > > > > > Also if merge is enabled on loop, that means merge is run > > > on both loop and low level block driver, and not sure if we > > > can benefit from that. > > > > why does merge still happen in low level block driver? > > Because scheduler is still working on low level disk. My question > is that why the scheduler in low level disk doesn't work now > if scheduler on loop can merge? The low level disk can still do merge, but since this is directio, the upper layer already dispatches request as big as possible. There is very little chance the requests can be merged again. > > > > > > > > So Could you provide some performance data about this patch? > > > > In my virtual machine, a workload improves from ~20M/s to ~50M/s. And I clearly > > see the request size becomes bigger. > > Could you share us what the low level disk is? It's a SATA ssd. Thanks, Shaohua
