On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 01:21:20PM -0700, J Freyensee wrote: > > > horrible. One idea would be to rename the current struct nvme_ns > > > to struct nvme_ns_link or similar and use the nvme_ns name for the > > > new structure. But that would involve a lot of churn. > > > > maybe nvme_ns_primary? > > Since it looks like it holds all unique identifier values and should hold > other namespace characteristics later, maybe: > > nvme_ns_item? > Or nvme_ns_entry? > Or nvme_ns_element? > Or nvme_ns_unit? > Or nvme_ns_entity? > Or nvme_ns_container? I hate them all (including the current ns_head name :)). I suspect the only way that would make my taste happy is to call this new one nvme_ns, but that would lead to a lot of churn.
