Re: [PATCH 1/2] block/loop: set hw_sectors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 04:49:23PM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>
> 
> Loop can handle any size of request. Limiting it to 255 sectors just
> burns the CPU for bio split and request merge for underlayer disk and
> also cause bad fs block allocation in directio mode.

Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>

Note that this will conflict with my loop blocksize series, we can fix
up whichever series goes in second.

> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/block/loop.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index b55a1f8..428da07 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -1799,6 +1799,7 @@ static int loop_add(struct loop_device **l, int i)
>  	}
>  	lo->lo_queue->queuedata = lo;
>  
> +	blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(lo->lo_queue, BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS);
>  	/*
>  	 * It doesn't make sense to enable merge because the I/O
>  	 * submitted to backing file is handled page by page.
> -- 
> 2.9.5
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux