On 08/23/2017 10:12 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 14:56 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: >> In Red Hat internal storage test wrt. blk-mq scheduler, we >> found that I/O performance is much bad with mq-deadline, especially >> about sequential I/O on some multi-queue SCSI devcies(lpfc, qla2xxx, >> SRP...) > > Hello Ming and Jens, > > There may not be enough time left to reach agreement about the whole patch > series before the kernel v4.14 merge window opens. How about focusing on > patches 1..8 of this series for kernel v4.14 and revisiting the rest of this > patch series later? I was going to go over the series today with 4.14 in mind. Looks to me like this should really be 2-3 patch series, that depend on each other. Might be better for review purposes as well. So I'd agree with Bart - can we get this split a bit and geared towards what we need for 4.14 at least, since it's getting close. And some of the changes do make me somewhat nervous, they need proper cooking time. -- Jens Axboe
