On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 19:47 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > ====================================================== > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > 4.13.0-rc6-next-20170822-dbg-00020-g39758ed8aae0-dirty #1746 Not tainted > ------------------------------------------------------ > fsck.ext4/148 is trying to acquire lock: > (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8116e73e>] __blkdev_put+0x33/0x190 > > but now in release context of a crosslock acquired at the following: > ((complete)&wait#2){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812159e0>] blk_execute_rq+0xbb/0xda > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> #1 ((complete)&wait#2){+.+.}: > lock_acquire+0x176/0x19e > __wait_for_common+0x50/0x1e3 > blk_execute_rq+0xbb/0xda > scsi_execute+0xc3/0x17d [scsi_mod] > sd_revalidate_disk+0x112/0x1549 [sd_mod] > rescan_partitions+0x48/0x2c4 > __blkdev_get+0x14b/0x37c > blkdev_get+0x191/0x2c0 > device_add_disk+0x2b4/0x3e5 > sd_probe_async+0xf8/0x17e [sd_mod] > async_run_entry_fn+0x34/0xe0 > process_one_work+0x2af/0x4d1 > worker_thread+0x19a/0x24f > kthread+0x133/0x13b > ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 > > -> #0 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}: > __blkdev_put+0x33/0x190 > blkdev_close+0x24/0x27 > __fput+0xee/0x18a > task_work_run+0x79/0xa0 > prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x9b/0xb5 > > other info that might help us debug this: > Possible unsafe locking scenario by crosslock: > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); > lock((complete)&wait#2); > lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); > unlock((complete)&wait#2); > > *** DEADLOCK *** > 4 locks held by fsck.ext4/148: > #0: (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8116e73e>] __blkdev_put+0x33/0x190 > #1: (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: [<ffffffff81217f16>] rcu_lock_acquire+0x0/0x20 > #2: (&(&host->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa00e7550>] ata_scsi_queuecmd+0x23/0x74 [libata] > #3: (&x->wait#14){-...}, at: [<ffffffff8106b593>] complete+0x18/0x50 > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 1 PID: 148 Comm: fsck.ext4 Not tainted 4.13.0-rc6-next-20170822-dbg-00020-g39758ed8aae0-dirty #1746 > Call Trace: > dump_stack+0x67/0x8e > print_circular_bug+0x2a1/0x2af > ? zap_class+0xc5/0xc5 > check_prev_add+0x76/0x20d > ? __lock_acquire+0xc27/0xcc8 > lock_commit_crosslock+0x327/0x35e > complete+0x24/0x50 > scsi_end_request+0x8d/0x176 [scsi_mod] > scsi_io_completion+0x1be/0x423 [scsi_mod] > __blk_mq_complete_request+0x112/0x131 > ata_scsi_simulate+0x212/0x218 [libata] > __ata_scsi_queuecmd+0x1be/0x1de [libata] > ata_scsi_queuecmd+0x41/0x74 [libata] > scsi_dispatch_cmd+0x194/0x2af [scsi_mod] > scsi_queue_rq+0x1e0/0x26f [scsi_mod] > blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x193/0x2a7 > ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2e/0x40 > blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x132/0x176 > __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x59/0xc5 > __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x5f/0xc1 > blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0xfc/0x10b > blk_flush_plug_list+0xc6/0x1eb > blk_finish_plug+0x25/0x32 > generic_writepages+0x56/0x63 > do_writepages+0x36/0x70 > __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x59/0x5f > filemap_write_and_wait+0x19/0x4f > __blkdev_put+0x5f/0x190 > blkdev_close+0x24/0x27 > __fput+0xee/0x18a > task_work_run+0x79/0xa0 > prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x9b/0xb5 > entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xab/0xad Byungchul, did you add the crosslock checks to lockdep? Can you have a look at the above report? That report namely doesn't make sense to me. Bart.