> Il giorno 05 ago 2017, alle ore 13:54, Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > ... > >> In addition, as for coverage, we made the empiric assumption that >> start-up time measured with each of the above easy-to-benchmark >> applications gives an idea of the time that it would take with any >> application of the same size and complexity. User feedback confirmed >> this assumptions so far. Of course there may well be exceptions. >> > > FWIW, I also have anecdotal evidence from at least one user that using > BFQ is way better on their desktop than CFQ ever was even under the best > of circumstances. I've had problems directly measuring it empirically but > this was also the first time I switched on BFQ to see what fell out so > it's early days yet. > Yeah, I'm constantly trying (without great success so far :) ) to turn this folklore into shared, repeatable tests and numbers. The latter could then be reliably evaluated, questioned or defended. Thanks, Paolo > -- > Mel Gorman > SUSE Labs
