Re: [PATCH 18/19] bcache: silence static checker warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2017/7/1 上午4:43, bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> In olden times, closure_return() used to have a hidden return built in.
> We removed the hidden return but forgot to add a new return here.  If
> "c" were NULL we would oops on the next line, but fortunately "c" is
> never NULL.  Let's just remove the if statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> index 24cb9b7..243391d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> @@ -1381,9 +1381,6 @@ static void cache_set_flush(struct closure *cl)
>  	struct btree *b;
>  	unsigned i;
>  
> -	if (!c)
> -		closure_return(cl);
> -
>  	bch_cache_accounting_destroy(&c->accounting);
>  
>  	kobject_put(&c->internal);
> 
Agree, cache_set_flush() is only called from a continue_at() in
__cache_set_unregister(). In this case, cl is always not NULL.

Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>

Thanks.

-- 
Coly Li



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux