Hi Max, I remembered you reporting this. I think this is a regression introduced with the scheduling, since ->rqs[] isn't static anymore. ->static_rqs[] is, but that's not indexable by the tag we find. So I think we need to guard those with a NULL check. The actual requests themselves are static, so we know the memory itself isn't going away. But if we race with completion, we could find a NULL there, validly. Since you could reproduce it, can you try the below? diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c index d0be72ccb091..b856b2827157 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static bool bt_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data) bitnr += tags->nr_reserved_tags; rq = tags->rqs[bitnr]; - if (rq->q == hctx->queue) + if (rq && rq->q == hctx->queue) iter_data->fn(hctx, rq, iter_data->data, reserved); return true; } @@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data) if (!reserved) bitnr += tags->nr_reserved_tags; rq = tags->rqs[bitnr]; - - iter_data->fn(rq, iter_data->data, reserved); + if (rq) + iter_data->fn(rq, iter_data->data, reserved); return true; } -- Jens Axboe
