Re: raid0 vs. mkfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/08/2016 06:44 PM, Coly Li wrote:
On 2016/12/8 上午12:59, Shaohua Li wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 07:50:33PM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for doing this, Coly! For raid0, this totally makes sense. The raid0
zones make things a little complicated though. I just had a brief look of your
proposed patch, which looks really complicated. I'd suggest something like
this:
1. split the bio according to zone boundary.
2. handle the splitted bio. since the bio is within zone range, calculating
the start and end sector for each rdev should be easy.

Hi Shaohua,

Thanks for your suggestion! I try to modify the code by your suggestion,
it is even more hard to make the code that way ...

Because even split bios for each zone, all the corner cases still exist
and should be taken care in every zoon. The code will be more complicated.


Hi Coly,

Did you manage to complete this patch? We are seeing its effect, not only with mkfs, but also with fstrim(8).

Avi



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux