Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: map all HWQ also in hyperthreaded system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 6/28/2017 5:38 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
Hi Max,

Hi Sagi,


This patch performs sequential mapping between CPUs and queues.
In case the system has more CPUs than HWQs then there are still
CPUs to map to HWQs. In hyperthreaded system, map the unmapped CPUs
and their siblings to the same HWQ.
This actually fixes a bug that found unmapped HWQs in a system with
2 sockets, 18 cores per socket, 2 threads per core (total 72 CPUs)
running NVMEoF (opens upto maximum of 64 HWQs).

The explanation can be a bit clearer...

I still need to take a look at the patch itself, but do note that
ideally we will never get to blk_mq_map_queues since we prefer
to map queues based on MSIX assignments. for nvme-rdma, this is
merely a fallback. And looking ahead, MSIX based mapping should
be the primary mapping logic.

we still have a fallback option in your series so we surly need some fix to the blk_mq_map_queues (also for stable kernel IMO. Jens/Christoph ?).


Can you please test with my patchset on converting nvme-rdma to
MSIX based mapping (I assume you are testing with mlx5 yes)?

Sure. does V6 is the last version of the patchset ?
I'll test it with ConnectX-5 adapter and send the results.

I'd be very much interested to know if the original problem
exists with this applied.

it will exist in case set->nr_hw_queues > dev->num_comp_vectors.


I'll take a closer look into the patch.

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux