Re: pwritev2 regression test for invalid flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pwritev2 regression test for invalid flags
From: "Stephen Bates" <sbates@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:53:24 +0000
Accept-language: en-CA, en-US
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>, "viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409

> 
>> I've already sent this patch to Al twice (including a stable tag),
>> but it didn't seem to make it anywhere.

Does anyone have ideas how we move this along? This is the missing link in allowing applications to request IO polling…

Stephen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pwritev2 regression test for invalid flags
  - From: Florian Weimer

Prev by Date: [PATCH v5 09/12] block: Document what queue type each function is intended for
Next by Date: [PATCH] pci/vmd: Move srcu cleanup after bus/irq domain removal
Previous by thread: [PATCH v5 00/12] More patches for kernel v4.13
Next by thread: Re: pwritev2 regression test for invalid flags
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux