Re: [PATCH 04/11] fs: add support for allowing applications to pass in write life time hints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:51:34AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> That sounds fragile... Is it really worth it to avoid stealing three
> bits in the inode? Do we have buffer_heads attached everywhere, that
> sounds surprising to me.

I'm not concerned about saving a few bits - we'll use those elsewhere
anyway.  I'm concerned about settings on one file descriptor having
an effect on other fds that doesn't look intended.  It's not the
end of the world, as multiple writers to the same file should
better be aware of each other, but the semantics of setting these
on a per-inode level still stink.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux