On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:51:34AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > That sounds fragile... Is it really worth it to avoid stealing three > bits in the inode? Do we have buffer_heads attached everywhere, that > sounds surprising to me. I'm not concerned about saving a few bits - we'll use those elsewhere anyway. I'm concerned about settings on one file descriptor having an effect on other fds that doesn't look intended. It's not the end of the world, as multiple writers to the same file should better be aware of each other, but the semantics of setting these on a per-inode level still stink.