Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two fixes for loop devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two fixes for loop devices
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:29:28 -0600
Cc: <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <149758925866.10006.12779875832895865043.stgit@noble>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1

On 06/15/2017 11:02 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>  one of these is a resend of a patch I sent a while back.
>  The other is new - loop closes files differently from close()
>  and in a way that can confuse NFS.

Are you wanting to get these into 4.12, or defer to 4.13?

-- 
Jens Axboe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two fixes for loop devices
  - From: NeilBrown

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] Two fixes for loop devices
  - From: NeilBrown

Prev by Date: Re: [dm-crypt] [RFC PATCH 0/4] Allow file systems to selectively bypass dm-crypt
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 04/11] fs: add support for allowing applications to pass in write life time hints
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] loop: Add PF_LESS_THROTTLE to block/loop device thread.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two fixes for loop devices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux