Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] blk-mq: Document locking assumptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] blk-mq: Document locking assumptions
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 08:11:00 +0200
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20170531225246.26261-10-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 03:52:43PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Document the locking assumptions in functions that modify
> blk_mq_ctx.rq_list to make it easier for humans to verify
> this code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v2 00/12] More patches for kernel v4.13
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- [PATCH v2 09/12] blk-mq: Document locking assumptions
  - From: Bart Van Assche

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] block: Document what queue type each function is intended for
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] blk-mq: Warn when attempting to run a hardware queue that is not mapped
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 09/12] blk-mq: Document locking assumptions
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 06/12] block: Add a comment above queue_lockdep_assert_held()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux