Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_unquiesce_queue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "axboe@xxxxxx" <axboe@xxxxxx>, "ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx" <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_unquiesce_queue
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 15:09:36 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
In-reply-to: <20170527142126.26079-2-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Wdcipoutbound: EOP-TRUE

On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 22:21 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> + * blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() - pair of blk_mq_quiesce_queue()
                                 ^^^^ 

Sorry but that comment is incomprehensible to me. Did you perhaps mean
"counterpart" instead of "pair"?

Bart.

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/8] blk-mq: fix & improve queue quiescing
  - From: Ming Lei
- [PATCH v2 1/8] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_unquiesce_queue
  - From: Ming Lei

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] blk-mq: use the introduced blk_mq_unquiesce_queue()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] block: introduce flag of QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 1/8] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_unquiesce_queue
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 2/8] block: introduce flag of QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux