> Il giorno 19 mag 2017, alle ore 16:37, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > > On 05/19/2017 02:39 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: >> @@ -692,8 +725,7 @@ void bfq_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd) >> /* >> * The idle tree may still contain bfq_queues belonging >> * to exited task because they never migrated to a different >> - * cgroup from the one being destroyed now. No one else >> - * can access them so it's safe to act without any lock. >> ++ * cgroup from the one being destroyed now. >> */ >> bfq_flush_idle_tree(st); >> > > Looks like an extra '+' snuck into that hunk. > Yes, sorry. Before possibly submitting a fixed version, I'll wait for a reply on my previous email in this thread, as the issue now seems more serious to me, and affecting CFQ too. Thanks, Paolo > -- > Jens Axboe >
