[...] >>>> What about those two (Kconfig) patches which is in your current >>>> bfq-4.11.y patchset. >>>> >>> >>> I'm not sure I fully understand the purpose of the two patches you >>> propose (in your following emails). The first patch seems to move BFQ >>> config options to a different position in Kconfig.iosched, but the >>> position of those items should be irrelevant. Am I missing something? >>> The second patch seems to have to do with configuration bits of bfq >>> for blk, yet such a bfq version is not available in mainline. >>> >>> In any case, for possible new submissions, you should inline your >>> patches. For complete instructions on submitting patches, have a look >>> at Documentation/process/submitting-patches >>> >> >> All my testings was done with your patchset against Linux v4.11.y. >> You have the same kconfig/kbuild stuff in your 0001 patch [1], so :-)? >> What you have in 0001 is missing in Linux v4.12-rc1. >> Not sure if this is intended. > > 4.12-rc1 contains bfq for blk-mq, while the patch you mention is for > bfq for blk (never accepted in mainline). Maybe you could get a > clearer idea by having a look at the commits that add bfq (for blk-mq) > in 4.12-rc1. > I recall, Markus pointed me to that difference between the BFQ implementations. For testing purposes: You want people to test BFQ in Linux v4.12? - Sedat - > Hope this helps, > Paolo > >> I will re-submit and add a "4.12" in the subject-line when I am at home. >> >> - Sedat - >> >> [1] http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/patches/4.11.0-v8r11/0001-block-cgroups-kconfig-build-bits-for-BFQ-v7r11-4.11..patch >
