On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 19:55 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Abdul, > > can you test the patch below? I'll try to create a way to inject > short WRITE SAME commands using qemu next, but I thought I'd give > you a chance to try it as well. No warnings with the patch. Thanks for all your support ! Reported-and-tested-by : Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > index c580b0138a7f..c7068520794b 100644 > --- a/block/blk-core.c > +++ b/block/blk-core.c > @@ -2644,8 +2644,6 @@ bool blk_update_request(struct request *req, int error, unsigned int nr_bytes) > return false; > } > > - WARN_ON_ONCE(req->rq_flags & RQF_SPECIAL_PAYLOAD); > - > req->__data_len -= total_bytes; > > /* update sector only for requests with clear definition of sector */ > @@ -2658,17 +2656,19 @@ bool blk_update_request(struct request *req, int error, unsigned int nr_bytes) > req->cmd_flags |= req->bio->bi_opf & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK; > } > > - /* > - * If total number of sectors is less than the first segment > - * size, something has gone terribly wrong. > - */ > - if (blk_rq_bytes(req) < blk_rq_cur_bytes(req)) { > - blk_dump_rq_flags(req, "request botched"); > - req->__data_len = blk_rq_cur_bytes(req); > - } > + if (!(req->rq_flags & RQF_SPECIAL_PAYLOAD)) { > + /* > + * If total number of sectors is less than the first segment > + * size, something has gone terribly wrong. > + */ > + if (blk_rq_bytes(req) < blk_rq_cur_bytes(req)) { > + blk_dump_rq_flags(req, "request botched"); > + req->__data_len = blk_rq_cur_bytes(req); > + } > > - /* recalculate the number of segments */ > - blk_recalc_rq_segments(req); > + /* recalculate the number of segments */ > + blk_recalc_rq_segments(req); > + } > > return true; > } > -- Regard's Abdul Haleem IBM Linux Technology Centre