Re: [PATCH 1/8] Use RWF_* flags for AIO operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please add subsystem prefixes to your subject lines, e.g.

fs:

for all the generic fs ones,

xfs:

for XFS,

block:

for block layer changes, etc.

>  
> -	if (flags & ~(RWF_HIPRI | RWF_DSYNC | RWF_SYNC))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
>  	init_sync_kiocb(&kiocb, filp);
> -	if (flags & RWF_HIPRI)
> -		kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_HIPRI;
> -	if (flags & RWF_DSYNC)
> -		kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC;
> -	if (flags & RWF_SYNC)
> -		kiocb.ki_flags |= (IOCB_DSYNC | IOCB_SYNC);
> +	ret = kiocb_set_rw_flags(&kiocb, flags);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

And please split factoring out kiocb_set_rw_flags into a separate
prep patch.

Otherwise these changes look fine:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux