On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 12:32:49PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > Kent, let me make this really simple for you, since you either still > don't understand how the development process works, or is under some > assumption that it doesn't apply to you - get some of the decades of > storage experience in that first thread to sign off on the patch and use > case. The patch doesn't go upstream before that happens, simple as that. No, you're the one who's consistently been under the assumption that it doesn't apply to you. You've got a history of applying patches to code that I maintain without even CCing the list, let alone myself, and introducing silent data corruption bugs into code that I wrote, without CCs, which I then had to debug, and then putting up absolutely ridiculous fights to get fixed. That's the sort of thing that process is supposed to avoid. To be clear, you and Christoph are the two reasons I've had to harp on process in the past - everyone else in the kernel has been fine. As I said before, I'm not trying to bypass you without communicating - but this has gone completely off the rails.
