On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 6:00 PM Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 9:18 PM Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I don't know when we'll be bumping the minimum version. IIRC 1.85.0 is > > going to be in debian trixie, so eventually we could bump it to that, > > but I'm not sure what the time frame will be for that. > > > > Maybe we can salvage this effort by gating both the lint and the > > unstable features on the versions where it works? @Miguel, what's your > > opinion? > > > > We could even make it simple, requiring 1.84 and not bothering with the > > older versions. > > Regarding Debian Trixie: unknown, since my understanding is that it > does not have a release date yet, but apparently mid May is the Hard > Freeze and then it may take e.g. a month or two to the release. > > And when it releases, we may want to wait a while before bumping it, > depending on how much time has passed since Rust 1.85.0 and depending > on whether we managed to get e.g. Ubuntu LTSs to provide a versioned > package etc. > > If something simple works, then let's just go for that -- we do not > care too much about older versions for linting purposes, since people > should be testing with the latest stable too anyway. It's not going to be simple because `rust_common_flags` is defined before the config is read, which means I'll have to sprinkle conditional logic in even more places to enable the lints. The most minimal version of this patch would drop all the build system changes and just have conditionally compiled polyfills for the strict provenance APIs. Are folks OK with that?
