Re: [PATCH] badblocks: Fix a nonsense WARN_ON() which checks whether a u64 variable < 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> 2025年3月10日 21:49,Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> 写道:
> 
> On 3/10/25 7:44 AM, Coly Li wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> 2025?3?10? 21:42?Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> ???
>>> 
>>> On 3/9/25 10:12 AM, Coly Li wrote:
>>>> Hi Jens,
>>>> 
>>>> Could you please take a look at it and pick this patch into the for-6.15/block branch? The patch is generated based on the for-6.15/block branch.
>>> 
>>> Just a heads-up - you don't need to send these emails outside of
>>> just sending the patch, I do get the patches. If I didn't, then that'd
>>> be a problem. If you feel patches need extra context, then just do a
>>> cover letter for them.
>> 
>> So if you are the receiver of the patch email, then I don?t need to
>> worry that you will treat it as a normal patch for review. Can I take
>> this as a rule?
> 
> Yes of course - I don't think I've ever seen anyone else send out a
> patch with a followup a few minutes later to apply it. Just send out the
> patch, and it should get applied. If it doesn't after a week or
> whatever, then feel free to send a reminder. But a reminder to apply it
> a few min after the original patch is a bit unusual and odd.

Copied. So normally I will not send a following email to explain the extra information. If it is necessary, I will compose a cover letter.

Thanks for the notice.

Coly Li




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux