The sysfs attribute nr_requests could be simultaneously updated from elevator switch/update or nr_hw_queue update code path. The update to nr_requests for each of those code paths runs holding q->elevator_lock. So we should protect access to sysfs attribute nr_requests using q-> elevator_lock instead of q->sysfs_lock. Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- block/blk-sysfs.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c index 1091c6fb6dd8..0bf00060e119 100644 --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c @@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ static ssize_t queue_requests_show(struct gendisk *disk, char *page) { ssize_t ret; - mutex_lock(&disk->queue->sysfs_lock); + mutex_lock(&disk->queue->elevator_lock); ret = queue_var_show(disk->queue->nr_requests, page); - mutex_unlock(&disk->queue->sysfs_lock); + mutex_unlock(&disk->queue->elevator_lock); return ret; } @@ -76,16 +76,16 @@ queue_requests_store(struct gendisk *disk, const char *page, size_t count) if (ret < 0) return ret; - mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock); memflags = blk_mq_freeze_queue(q); + mutex_lock(&q->elevator_lock); if (nr < BLKDEV_MIN_RQ) nr = BLKDEV_MIN_RQ; err = blk_mq_update_nr_requests(disk->queue, nr); if (err) ret = err; + mutex_unlock(&q->elevator_lock); blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q, memflags); - mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock); return ret; } @@ -692,7 +692,6 @@ static struct attribute *blk_mq_queue_attrs[] = { /* * Attributes which are protected with q->sysfs_lock. */ - &queue_requests_entry.attr, #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_WBT &queue_wb_lat_entry.attr, #endif @@ -701,6 +700,7 @@ static struct attribute *blk_mq_queue_attrs[] = { * other than q->sysfs_lock. */ &elv_iosched_entry.attr, + &queue_requests_entry.attr, /* * Attributes which don't require locking. -- 2.47.1