在 2025/2/22 14:16, Coly Li 写道:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 09:12:53AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
Hi,
在 2025/02/21 18:12, Coly Li 写道:
So we don’t need to add a negative return value for partial success/failure?
Coly Li.
Yes, I think so. No one really use this value, and patch 10 clean this
up by changing return type to bool.
OK, then it is fine to me.
It will be good to add a code comment that parital setting will be treated as failure.
Thanks.
Thank you for your review. I will add comment in the next version.
--
Thanks,
Nan