[PATCH v2 1/2] blk-wbt: Fix some comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>

wbt_wait() no longer uses a spinlock as a parameter. Update the function
comments accordingly.

RWB_UNKNOWN_BUMP is used when we gradually adjust scale_steps toward the
center state, which is a value of 0.

Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-wbt.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c
index 6dfc659d22e2..8b73c0c11aec 100644
--- a/block/blk-wbt.c
+++ b/block/blk-wbt.c
@@ -136,8 +136,9 @@ enum {
 	RWB_MIN_WRITE_SAMPLES	= 3,
 
 	/*
-	 * If we have this number of consecutive windows with not enough
-	 * information to scale up or down, scale up.
+	 * If we have this number of consecutive windows without enough
+	 * information to scale up or down, slowly return to center state
+	 * (step == 0).
 	 */
 	RWB_UNKNOWN_BUMP	= 5,
 };
@@ -638,11 +639,7 @@ static void wbt_cleanup(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
 	__wbt_done(rqos, flags);
 }
 
-/*
- * May sleep, if we have exceeded the writeback limits. Caller can pass
- * in an irq held spinlock, if it holds one when calling this function.
- * If we do sleep, we'll release and re-grab it.
- */
+/* May sleep, if we have exceeded the writeback limits. */
 static void wbt_wait(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
 {
 	struct rq_wb *rwb = RQWB(rqos);
-- 
2.25.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux