Re: Re: nvme-tcp: fix a possible UAF when failing to send request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, 



     Thank you for your reply.


     In nvme-rdma we use nvme_host_path_error(rq) ,   the prerequisites are -EIO,  ignore this condition? 
 in nvme-tcp this judgment condition is different,  use the function nvme_host_path_error , 
it should be possible to go to nvme_complete_rq ->  nvme_retry_req -- request->mq_hctx have been freed, is NULL.            




zhang.guanghui@xxxxxxxx



 



From: Max Gurtovoy



Date: 2025-02-10 18:24



To: Maurizio Lombardi; zhang.guanghui@xxxxxxxx; sagi; kbusch; sashal; chunguang.xu



CC: linux-kernel; linux-nvme; linux-block



Subject: Re: nvme-tcp: fix a possible UAF when failing to send request



 



On 10/02/2025 12:01, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:



> On Mon Feb 10, 2025 at 8:41 AM CET, zhang.guanghui@xxxxxxxx wrote:



>> Hello



>>



>>



> I guess you have to fix your mail client.



>



>>      When using the nvme-tcp driver in a storage cluster, the driver may trigger a null pointer causing the host to crash several times.



>> By analyzing the vmcore, we know the direct cause is that  the request->mq_hctx was used after free.



>>



>>



>> CPU1                                                                   CPU2



>>



>> nvme_tcp_poll                                                          nvme_tcp_try_send  --failed to send reqrest 13



> This simply looks like a race condition between nvme_tcp_poll() and nvme_tcp_try_send()



> Personally, I would try to fix it inside the nvme-tcp driver without



> touching the core functions.



>



> Maybe nvme_tcp_poll should just ensure that io_work completes before



> calling nvme_tcp_try_recv(), the POLLING flag should then prevent io_work



> from getting rescheduled by the nvme_tcp_data_ready() callback.



>



>



> Maurizio



 



It seems to me that the HOST_PATH_ERROR handling can be improved in



nvme-tcp.



 



In nvme-rdma we use nvme_host_path_error(rq) and nvme_cleanup_cmd(rq) in



case we fail to submit a command..



 



can you try to replacing nvme_tcp_end_request(blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(req),



NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR); call with the similar logic we use in



nvme-rdma for host path error handling ?



 



 



 



 






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux