Re: [RFC 0/3] Btrfs checksum offload

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/3/2025 7:10 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> But NODATASUM isn't something that is actively recommended unless you
> know what you're doing. I thought of your patches as an offload of the
> checksum tree to the T10-PI extended sector format

You thought right, patches do "offload to T10-PI format" part. That part 
is generic for any upper-layer user. One only needs to send flag 
REQ_INTEGRITY_OFFLOAD for that.
And for the other part "suppress data-csums at Btrfs level", I thought 
of using NODATASUM.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux