Re: [RFC 0/3] Btrfs checksum offload

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:32:04PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> There is value in avoiding Copy-on-write (COW) checksum tree on
> a device that can anyway store checksums inline (as part of PI).
> This would eliminate extra checksum writes/reads, making I/O
> more CPU-efficient.

Another potential benefit: if the device does the checksum, then I think
btrfs could avoid the stable page writeback overhead and let the
contents be changable all the way until it goes out on the wire.

Though I feel the very specific device format constraints that can
support an offload like this are a unfortunate.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux